From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PATE v. BAKER

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Nov 28, 1916
73 So. 125 (Ala. Crim. App. 1916)

Opinion

Decided November 28, 1916.

APPEAL from Coosa Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. S.L. BREWER.

JOHN A. DARDEN, for appellant. RIDDLE, BURT RIDDLE, for appellee.



Assumpsit by D.W. Baker against J.C. Pate. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant appeals. Affirmed.


(1) The judgment in this case was rendered on the 6th day of December, 1915, and the indorsement of the trial judge on the bill of exceptions shows that it was not presented until the 7th day of March, 1916, more than 90 days from the day on which the judgment was rendered, and cannot be looked to as a part of the record for the purpose of reviewing the trial court. — Box, et al. v. Southern Ry. Co., 184 Ala. 598, 64 So. 69; Harper v. State, 13 Ala. App. 47, 69 So. 302.

(2) The only matter assigned as error is the giving of the affirmative charge for appellee and the refusal of a like charge to appellant; and, as those are matters that cannot be reviewed in the absence of a bill of exceptions, the judgment must be affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

PATE v. BAKER

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Nov 28, 1916
73 So. 125 (Ala. Crim. App. 1916)
Case details for

PATE v. BAKER

Case Details

Full title:Pate v. Baker. Assumpsit

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Nov 28, 1916

Citations

73 So. 125 (Ala. Crim. App. 1916)
73 So. 125

Citing Cases

Nash v. Rattray

Goodhue Lusk, of Gadsden, for appellee. The questions presented cannot be considered in absence of a bill of…