From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patanska v. Kuznia

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 4, 1929
145 A. 921 (N.J. 1929)

Opinion

Decided February 4th, 1929.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery.

Appeal of Pazia Dugan Kuznia et al.

Mr. Richard Doherty, for the appellant.

Mr. John Milton, Mr. Herbert Clark Gilson and Messrs. O'Brien Tartalsky, for the respondents.


The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fielder, and reported in 102 N.J. Eq. 408. For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, KALISCH, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Patanska v. Kuznia

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 4, 1929
145 A. 921 (N.J. 1929)
Case details for

Patanska v. Kuznia

Case Details

Full title:ANNA PATANSKA et al., executors, c., complainants, v. PAZIA DUGAN KUZNIA…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Feb 4, 1929

Citations

145 A. 921 (N.J. 1929)
145 A. 921

Citing Cases

In re Bumsted

"Specific legacies are subject to ademption; and it is the settled rule of construction that a legacy will…

Horton v. Horton

The question is whether there was an equitable conversion. It is quite clear that the testator made a general…