From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patacsil v. LeGrand

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
May 13, 2013
CASE NUMBER: 3:13-CV-00117-MMD-VPC (D. Nev. May. 13, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NUMBER: 3:13-CV-00117-MMD-VPC

05-13-2013

RUFINO PATACSIL, Petitioner, v. WARDEN LEGRAND, et al., Respondents.


JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

___ Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict. ___ Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered. X Decision by Court. This action came to be considered before the Court. The issues have been considered and a decision has been rendered.

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition is DISMISSED with prejudice as time-barred.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED.

Judgment is entered in favor of respondents and against petitioner.

LANCE S. WILSON

Clerk

Jennifer Cotter

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Patacsil v. LeGrand

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
May 13, 2013
CASE NUMBER: 3:13-CV-00117-MMD-VPC (D. Nev. May. 13, 2013)
Case details for

Patacsil v. LeGrand

Case Details

Full title:RUFINO PATACSIL, Petitioner, v. WARDEN LEGRAND, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: May 13, 2013

Citations

CASE NUMBER: 3:13-CV-00117-MMD-VPC (D. Nev. May. 13, 2013)