Opinion
June 15, 1998
Appeal from the order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Thomas, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant's motion for summary judgment. Although the defendant established a prima facie case that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury ( see, Gaddy v. Eyler, 79 N.Y.2d 955), the affidavit of the plaintiff's treating chiropractor stating, inter alia, that she suffers from objectively measured, specifically quantified restrictions of motion of her cervical and lumbosacral spine was sufficient to raise a triable question of fact as to whether she suffered a serious injury ( see, Lopez v. Senatore, 65 N.Y.2d 1017; Fitzpatrick v. Spottiswood, 243 A.D.2d 676; Moore v. Tappen, 242 A.D.2d 526; Wolfram v. Vassilou, 239 A.D.2d 340; Carucci v. Tzimopoulos, 238 A.D.2d 459; Grullon v. Chang Ok Chu, 240 A.D.2d 367).
Mangano, P. J., Miller, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.