From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paster v. Nagelsmith

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Mar 1, 1900
30 Misc. 791 (N.Y. App. Term 1900)

Opinion

March, 1900.

Engel, Engel Oppenheimer, for appellant.

Sands Wasservogel, for respondent.


The plaintiff was suspended by force of chapter 16, section 243, of the Grand Lodge Laws, Knights of Pythias, by the mere fact that he was in arrears for three months' dues. An affirmative action on the part of the defendant or of the Grand Lodge was unnecessary. He "stood suspended", and by section 8 of article 5 of the by-laws of the Republic Relief Association, he could receive no benefits until three months after his reinstatement.

Present: TRUAX, P.J.; SCOTT and DUGRO, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Paster v. Nagelsmith

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Mar 1, 1900
30 Misc. 791 (N.Y. App. Term 1900)
Case details for

Paster v. Nagelsmith

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH PASTER, Appellant, v . NATHAN D. NAGELSMITH, etc., Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Mar 1, 1900

Citations

30 Misc. 791 (N.Y. App. Term 1900)

Citing Cases

Taufer v. Brotherhood of Painters

( Fink v. Fink, 171 N.Y. 616, 621; Delaney v. Kelly, 103 App. Div. 409; Seymour v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life…

Giniso v. Calabrian Am. Citizens' M.B. Assn

We think the question should be answered in the affirmative. Paster v. Nagelsmith, 30 Misc. 791. The only…