From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Passariello v. Lally

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 18, 2000
268 A.D.2d 464 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued October 26, 1999

January 18, 2000

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (D'Emilio, J.), entered March 3, 1999, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the plaintiffs and against her on the issue of liability.

Frank V. Merlino (Sweetbaum Sweetbaum, Lake Success, N Y [Marshall D. Sweetbaum] of counsel), for appellant.

Sonin Genis (Pollack, Pollack, Isaac DeCicco, New York, N Y [Robert J. Genis and Brian J. Isaac] of counsel), for respondents.

DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., LEO F. McGINITY, HOWARD MILLER and SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the interlocutory judgment is reversed, on the facts and as a matter of discretion, and a new trial is granted, with costs to abide the event.

Under the circumstances of this case, the jury verdict finding that the plaintiff was negligent, but that his negligence was not a proximate cause of the accident, was against the weight of the evidence (see, Nicastro v. Park, 113 A.D.2d 129, 134 ; see also, Bahadur v. G.C. Constr. Corp., 265 A.D.2d 514 [2d Dept., Oct. 25, 1999]; Stanton v. Gasport View Dairy Farm, 244 A.D.2d 893 ).

RITTER, J.P., McGINITY, H. MILLER, and FEUERSTEIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Passariello v. Lally

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 18, 2000
268 A.D.2d 464 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Passariello v. Lally

Case Details

Full title:ANIELLO P. PASSARIELLO, et al., respondents, v. CATHERINE J. LALLY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 18, 2000

Citations

268 A.D.2d 464 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
701 N.Y.S.2d 913

Citing Cases

Soto v. New York City Transit Authority

After a trial on the issue of liability, the jury found that the plaintiff was negligent, but that his…