From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Passantino v. Board of Educ

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 26, 1977
363 N.E.2d 1373 (N.Y. 1977)

Opinion

Argued March 21, 1977

Decided April 26, 1977

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, FREDERIC E. HAMMER, J.

W. Bernard Richland, Corporation Counsel (Bernard Burstein and L. Kevin Sheridan of counsel), for appellant.

Joseph P. Napoli and Sherman P. Rothman for respondent.


MEMORANDUM. The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed.

Upon our review of the facts in this record, as set forth in the dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice COHALAN at the Appellate Division, it is apparent that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case at trial. There was no showing of negligence or lack of due care on the part of the defendant board of education. Therefore, the defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint, made at the end of the entire case, should have been granted.

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur.

Order reversed, with costs, and the complaint dismissed in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Passantino v. Board of Educ

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 26, 1977
363 N.E.2d 1373 (N.Y. 1977)
Case details for

Passantino v. Board of Educ

Case Details

Full title:ROY C. PASSANTINO, an Infant, by His Father and Natural Guardian, ROBERT…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 26, 1977

Citations

363 N.E.2d 1373 (N.Y. 1977)
363 N.E.2d 1373
395 N.Y.S.2d 628

Citing Cases

Benitez v. N.Y. Bd. of Educ

hey are obvious and necessary, just as a fencer accepts the risk of a thrust by his antagonist or a spectator…

Totan v. Bd. of Educ. of the City of New York

However, the trial court set aside the jury verdict on the basis that "[t]he record is devoid of any evidence…