From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pasion v. Haviland

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 14, 2011
No. CIV S-10-3227 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-3227 GGH P.

September 14, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. This case proceeds against one defendant who allegedly retaliated against plaintiff. Plaintiff alleges that the defendant told him to withdraw a complaint and when plaintiff refused, he was placed in administrative segregation. The facts of this case are rather straightforward and do not warrant the appointment of counsel.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel (Docket No. 18) is denied.

DATED: September 13, 2011


Summaries of

Pasion v. Haviland

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 14, 2011
No. CIV S-10-3227 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2011)
Case details for

Pasion v. Haviland

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE M. PASION, Plaintiff, v. JOHN A. HAVILAND, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 14, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-3227 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2011)