From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pasion v. Haviland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 13, 2011
No. CIV S-10-3227 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-3227 GGH P

09-13-2011

GEORGE M. PASION, Plaintiff, v. JOHN A. HAVILAND, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. This case proceeds against one defendant who allegedly retaliated against plaintiff. Plaintiff alleges that the defendant told him to withdraw a complaint and when plaintiff refused, he was placed in administrative segregation. The facts of this case are rather straightforward and do not warrant the appointment of counsel.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel (Docket No. 18) is denied.

Gregory G. Hollows

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Pasion v. Haviland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 13, 2011
No. CIV S-10-3227 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2011)
Case details for

Pasion v. Haviland

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE M. PASION, Plaintiff, v. JOHN A. HAVILAND, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 13, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-3227 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2011)