Paschoal v. Plum, PBC

Full title: RAFAEL PASCHOAL, LISA CHONG, and ADINA RINGLER, as individuals, on behalf…

Court: United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jan 19, 2023

4:21-cv-07029-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2023)

Opinion

4:21-cv-07029-HSG

01-19-2023

RAFAEL PASCHOAL, LISA CHONG, and ADINA RINGLER, as individuals, on behalf of themselves, the general public and those similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. PLUM, PBC, Defendant.

WINSTON & STRAWN LLP Christopher M. Murphy (admitted pro hac vice) WINSTON & STRAWN LLP Dana L. Cook-Milligan (SBN: 301340) Attorneys for Defendant Plum, PBC

Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., J.

WINSTON & STRAWN LLP Christopher M. Murphy (admitted pro hac vice)

WINSTON & STRAWN LLP Dana L. Cook-Milligan (SBN: 301340)

Attorneys for Defendant Plum, PBC

ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONFORM THE DOCKET TO REFLECT THE PARTIES AND COUNSEL FOLLOWING ECF NO. 73

Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., J.

ORDER

Having read and considered Plum, PBC's Administrative Motion, and for good cause appearing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that

1. the Court docket shall be administratively conformed to accurately reflect the state of the parties and counsel of record following (i) the Motion to Dismiss Order found at Dkt. No. 73, and (ii) Plaintiffs not filing an amended complaint following the Motion to Dismiss Order, as follows:

a. Campbell Soup Company is terminated as a defendant without prejudice, and its attorneys are terminated as counsel of record in the action; and

b. Sun-Maid Growers of California is terminated as a defendant without prejudice, and its attorneys are terminated as counsel of record as representing Sun-Maid Growers of California. Nothing impacts Plum's attorneys' status as counsel of record for Plum in this matter (who are the same counsel that represented Sun-Maid).

IT IS SO ORDERED.