From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paschal v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 6, 2000
774 So. 2d 775 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 3D00-1831.

December 6, 2000.

An appeal under Fla. R.App.P. 9.140(i) from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Ronald C. Dresnick, Judge.

Carl T. Paschal, in proper person.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Darien M. Doe, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before COPE, SHEVIN and SORONDO, JJ.


The sentence imposed on defendant-appellant Carl T. Paschal does not exceed the legal maximum, see § 813.011, Fla. Stat. (1965), and therefore his motion to correct illegal sentence is denied. Defendant's challenge to the factual basis underlying his conviction is one which must be brought under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, and as such, is time-barred. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Paschal v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 6, 2000
774 So. 2d 775 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Paschal v. State

Case Details

Full title:Carl T. PASCHAL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Dec 6, 2000

Citations

774 So. 2d 775 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

Naylor v. State

Affirmed. See Paschal v. State, 774 So.2d 775 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(b).…