From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Partrich v. Attorney Grievance Comm'n

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Feb 5, 2014
SC: 147657 (Mich. Feb. 5, 2014)

Opinion

SC: 147657 AGC: 0379-12 and 0380-12

02-05-2014

MICHAEL PARTRICH and DEBRA PARTRICH BLACK, Plaintiffs, v. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.


Order

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano,

Justices

On order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered. Pursuant to MCR 9.225, we DIRECT the Attorney Grievance Commission to provide a supplemental response in support of its decision to close AGC File No. 0379-12, in light of the deposition testimony attached to the request for investigation in this case, in which the deponents disclaimed any knowledge of facts that supported their settlement demand and probate court actions against the plaintiffs' father. The complaint for superintending control remains pending.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

___________________

Clerk


Summaries of

Partrich v. Attorney Grievance Comm'n

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Feb 5, 2014
SC: 147657 (Mich. Feb. 5, 2014)
Case details for

Partrich v. Attorney Grievance Comm'n

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL PARTRICH and DEBRA PARTRICH BLACK, Plaintiffs, v. ATTORNEY…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Feb 5, 2014

Citations

SC: 147657 (Mich. Feb. 5, 2014)