From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Swordfish Partners v. S.S. N.C.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Dec 28, 2018
Case No. 8:18-cv-1808-T-33SPF (M.D. Fla. Dec. 28, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 8:18-cv-1808-T-33SPF

12-28-2018

SWORDFISH PARTNERS, Plaintiff, v. THE S.S. NORTH CAROLINA, her hull, cargo, tackle, boilers, machinery and appurtenances, which lies within one nautical mile of a point with coordinates 33 degrees 24'00" North Latitude and 78 degrees 40'00" West Longitude, Defendant.


ORDER

This cause comes before the Court upon consideration of United States Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn's Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 32), filed on December 26, 2018, recommending that Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. # 28), be denied without prejudice. Judge Flynn also recommends that the Clerk's entry of default be vacated. (Id.). There is a 14-day period allotted for the filing of objections. (Id.). However, on December 27, 2018, Plaintiff filed a Notice stating that it does not object to the Report and Recommendation. (Doc. # 33). Accordingly, and consistent with the following, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. Discussion

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1112 (1983).

In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n. 9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Castro Bobadilla v. Reno, 826 F. Supp. 1428, 1431-32 (S.D. Fla. 1993), aff'd, 28 F.3d 116 (11th Cir. 1994).

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings, conclusions and recommendations, and giving de novo review to matters of law, the Court accepts the factual findings and legal conclusions of the magistrate judge, and the recommendation of the magistrate judge.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED: (1) United States Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn's Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 32) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED. (2) Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. # 28) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (3) The Clerk's entry of default (Doc. # 27) is VACATED.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in Tampa, Florida, this 28th day of December, 2018.

/s/_________

VIRGINIA M. HERNANDEZ COVINGTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Swordfish Partners v. S.S. N.C.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Dec 28, 2018
Case No. 8:18-cv-1808-T-33SPF (M.D. Fla. Dec. 28, 2018)
Case details for

Swordfish Partners v. S.S. N.C.

Case Details

Full title:SWORDFISH PARTNERS, Plaintiff, v. THE S.S. NORTH CAROLINA, her hull…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Date published: Dec 28, 2018

Citations

Case No. 8:18-cv-1808-T-33SPF (M.D. Fla. Dec. 28, 2018)