From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Partida-Benitez v. Gonzales

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 17, 2006
203 F. App'x 124 (9th Cir. 2006)

Opinion

Submitted Oct. 11, 2006.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Carlos A. Cruz, Esq., Law Offices of Carlos A. Cruz, Alhambra, CA, for Petitioners.

CAC-District, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Cindy S. Ferrier, Esq., P. Michael Truman, Esq., DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.


On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Agency Nos. A95-198-364, A95-198-365, A95-198-366.

Before: TASHIMA, W. FLETCHER and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

This is a petition for review from the denial of petitioners' applications for cancellation

Page 125.

of removal.

Respondent's unopposed motion to dismiss in part this petition for review for lack of jurisdiction with respect to petitioner Rosa Amelia Partida-Benitez is granted. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.2003); Montero-Martinez v. Ashcroft, 277 F.3d 1137, 1144 (9th Cir.2002).

Respondent's unopposed motion for summary disposition in part with respect to petitioners Mayra Guadalupe Medina-Partida and Rosa Maria Medina-Partida is granted. Petitioners do not challenge the finding that they lack a qualifying relative to establish eligibility for cancellation of removal. See 8 U.S. C.§ 1229b(b)(1)(D); Vasquez-Zavala v. Ashcroft, 324 F.3d 1105, 1107 (9th Cir.2003).

All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal and voluntary departure confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) and Desta v. Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004), shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.

PETITION DISMISSED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.


Summaries of

Partida-Benitez v. Gonzales

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 17, 2006
203 F. App'x 124 (9th Cir. 2006)
Case details for

Partida-Benitez v. Gonzales

Case Details

Full title:Rosa Amelia PARTIDA-BENITEZ; Mayra Guadalupe Medina-Partida; Rosa Maria…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Oct 17, 2006

Citations

203 F. App'x 124 (9th Cir. 2006)