From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Partee v. Chapman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATHENS DIVISION
Aug 28, 2013
CASE NO.3:12-CV-105-CDL (M.D. Ga. Aug. 28, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO.3:12-CV-105-CDL

08-28-2013

BARRY MARQUEZ PARTEE, Plaintiff, v. JOE CHAPMAN, et al., Defendants.


42 U.S.C. § 1983


ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court pursuant to a Report and Recommendation by the United States Magistrate Judge entered on July 2, 2013. Neither party has filed an objection to this Recommendation as permitted by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and therefore, the Court reviews the Recommendation for plain error. Finding no plain error or manifest injustice, the Court adopts the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, GRANTING Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Complaint, as to compensatory and punitive damages, and DENYING as to nominal damages, and makes it the order of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED, this 28th day of August, 2013.

______________________

CLAY D. LAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Partee v. Chapman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATHENS DIVISION
Aug 28, 2013
CASE NO.3:12-CV-105-CDL (M.D. Ga. Aug. 28, 2013)
Case details for

Partee v. Chapman

Case Details

Full title:BARRY MARQUEZ PARTEE, Plaintiff, v. JOE CHAPMAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATHENS DIVISION

Date published: Aug 28, 2013

Citations

CASE NO.3:12-CV-105-CDL (M.D. Ga. Aug. 28, 2013)