From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parsons v. Sears, Roebuck Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 27, 1944
31 S.E.2d 605 (Ga. Ct. App. 1944)

Opinion

30609.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1944.

Action for damages; from Fulton superior court — Judge V. B. Moore. May 13, 1944.

Fine Hendrix, for plaintiff.

Alston, Foster, Sibley Miller, for defendant.


1. The evidence was in sharp conflict as to whether the plaintiff's injuries were proximately caused by negligence on the part of the defendant, whether the plaintiff by the exercise of ordinary care could have avoided the consequences of any negligence of the defendant, or whether the injuries were caused solely by the plaintiff's negligence, and a verdict in favor of the defendant was authorized.

2. The excerpts from the charge complained of, when considered in connection with the entire charge, show no harmful error.

Judgment affirmed. Sutton, P. J., and Felton, J., concur.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1944.


Summaries of

Parsons v. Sears, Roebuck Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 27, 1944
31 S.E.2d 605 (Ga. Ct. App. 1944)
Case details for

Parsons v. Sears, Roebuck Company

Case Details

Full title:PARSONS v. SEARS, ROEBUCK COMPANY

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Sep 27, 1944

Citations

31 S.E.2d 605 (Ga. Ct. App. 1944)
31 S.E.2d 605