From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parsons v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION
Jan 28, 2020
Civil Action No. 4:19-cv-00103-P-BP (N.D. Tex. Jan. 28, 2020)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 4:19-cv-00103-P-BP

01-28-2020

CHERILYN PATRICIA PARSONS, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation in this case. See ECF No. 23. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is ripe for review. The undersigned reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED for further administrative proceedings.

SO ORDERED on this 28th day of January, 2020.

/s/_________

Mark T. Pittman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Parsons v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION
Jan 28, 2020
Civil Action No. 4:19-cv-00103-P-BP (N.D. Tex. Jan. 28, 2020)
Case details for

Parsons v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:CHERILYN PATRICIA PARSONS, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION

Date published: Jan 28, 2020

Citations

Civil Action No. 4:19-cv-00103-P-BP (N.D. Tex. Jan. 28, 2020)