From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parsons v. Paige

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Oct 18, 2024
No. 24-10247 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 18, 2024)

Opinion

24-10247

10-18-2024

David Parsons, Plaintiff, v. Paige, et al., Defendants.


Curtis Ivy, Jr. Mag. Judge

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [25]

JUDITH E. LEVY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Curtis Ivy, Jr.'s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 25) recommending that the Court grant Defendant Spaulding's motion for summary judgment on the basis of exhaustion (ECF No. 20) and that Defendant Spaulding be dismissed. The parties were required to file specific written objections, if any, within 14 days of service. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(2); E.D. Mich. L.R. 72.1(d). No objections were filed. The Court has nevertheless carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation and concurs in the reasoning and result. Accordingly, The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 25) is ADOPTED;

Defendant's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 20) is GRANTED; and

Defendant Spaulding is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

By failing to object to the Report and Recommendation, the parties have forfeited any further right of appeal. United States v. Wandahsega, 924 F.3d 868, 878 (6th Cir. 2019); see also Berkshire v. Beauvais, 928 F.3d 520, 530 (6th Cir. 2019).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Parsons v. Paige

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Oct 18, 2024
No. 24-10247 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 18, 2024)
Case details for

Parsons v. Paige

Case Details

Full title:David Parsons, Plaintiff, v. Paige, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Oct 18, 2024

Citations

No. 24-10247 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 18, 2024)