Opinion
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03291-MSK-CBS
05-11-2012
David A. Lane Lauren L. Fontana Killmer Lane & Newman, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff Sonja S. McKenzie Senter Goldfarb & Rice, LLC Attorney for Defendant Patricia Nealey
PROTECTIVE ORDER
Each party and each Counsel of Record stipulate and move the Court for Protective Order pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure concerning the treatment of Confidential Information (as hereinafter defined), and, as grounds therefore, state as follows:
1. In this action, at least one of the Parties has sought and/or may seek Confidential
Information (as defined in paragraph 2 below). The Parties also anticipate seeking additional Confidential Information during discovery and that there will be questioning concerning Confidential Information in the course of depositions. The Parties assert the disclosure of such information outside the scope of this litigation could result in significant injury to one or more of the Parties' business or privacy interests as well as the privacy interests of third parties who are not subject to this litigation. The Parties have entered into this Stipulation and request the Court enter the within Protective Order for the purpose of preventing the disclosure and use of Confidential Information except as set forth herein:
2. "Confidential Information" means any document, file, portions of files, transcribed testimony, or response to a discovery request, including any extract, abstract, chart, summary, note, or copy made therefrom—not made available to the public—and designated by one of the Parties in the manner provided in paragraph 3 below as containing Confidential Information, including but not limited to:
a. Personnel files of District employees;
b. Any student files or information contained in student files, including Individualized Education Plans ("IEP");
c. Medical records and/or "Protected Health Information"; and
c. Confidential findings of the Legal Center pertaining to the District.
Employees have a privacy interest in their personnel files. Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. Tolefson, 961 P.2d 1150, 1156 (Colo. App. 1988); Denver Publ'g Co. v. Univ. of Colo., 812 P.2d 682, 685 (Colo. App. 1990); C.R.S. § 24-72-204(a)(3)(II)(A).
Student records are confidential pursuant to FERPA, codified at 20 U.S.C. § 1232(g), and C.R.S. § 22-1-123.
--------
The disclosure of student files and related confidential information requires parental notification and may also require consent. Pursuant to the Family Education Rights & Privacy Act ("FERPA"), "personal information shall only be transferred to a third party on the condition that such party will not permit any other party to have access to such information without the written consent of the parents of the student. If a third party outside the educational agency or institution permits access to information in violation of paragraph (2)(A), or fails to destroy information in violation of paragraph (1)(F), the educational agency or institution shall be prohibited from permitting access to information from education records to that third party for a period of not less than five years." 20 U.S.C. § 1232g(4)(B).
In addition, any information designated by a party as confidential will first be reviewed by that party's lawyer who will certify that the designation as confidential is "based on a good faith belief that [the information] is confidential or otherwise entitled to protection" under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c)(7). See Gillard v. Boulder Valley Sch. Dist., 196 F.R.D. 382, 386 (D. Colo. 2000).
3. "Protected Health Information" includes, but is not limited to, a patient's name, address, birth date, admission date, discharge date, telephone number, fax number, e-mail address, social security number, medical records number, insurance plan information, account number, and/or certificate/license number.
4. Where Confidential Information is produced, provided or otherwise disclosed by a Party in response to any discovery request, it will be designated in the following manner:
a. By imprinting the word "Confidential" on the first page or cover of any document produced;
b. By imprinting the word "Confidential" next to or above any response to a discovery request; and
c. With respect to transcribed testimony, by giving written notice to opposing counsel designating such portions as "Confidential" no later than ten calendar days after receipt of the transcribed testimony.
5. All Confidential Information provided by a Party in response to a discovery request or transcribed testimony shall be subject to the following restrictions:
a. It shall be used only for the purpose of this litigation and not for any business or other purpose whatsoever;
b. It shall not be communicated or disclosed by any Party's counsel or a Party in any manner, either directly or indirectly, to anyone except for
purposes of this case and unless an affidavit in the form of Exhibit A has been signed.
6. Individuals authorized to review Confidential Information pursuant to this Protective Order include, but are not limited to, (a) the Parties to this action and their undersigned counsel, (b) persons employed or associated with undersigned counsel whose assistance is utilized by said attorneys in the preparation for trial, at trial, or at other proceedings in this case; (c) any retained experts; and (d) other persons by written agreement of the parties. These authorized persons shall hold Confidential Information in confidence and shall not divulge the Confidential Information, either verbally or in writing, to any other person, entity or government agency unless authorized to do so by Court order.
7. The Party's counsel who discloses Confidential Information, including disclosure to a retained expert, shall be responsible for assuring compliance with the terms of this Protective Order with respect to persons to whom such Confidential Information is disclosed by obtaining and retaining the original affidavits signed by qualified recipients of Confidential Information, and maintaining a list of all persons to whom any Confidential Information is disclosed.
8. During the pendency of this action, opposing counsel may upon Court order or agreement of the Parties inspect the list maintained by counsel pursuant to paragraph 6 above upon showing of substantial need in order to establish the source of an unauthorized disclosure of Confidential Information and that opposing counsel are unable to otherwise identify the source of the disclosure. If counsel disagrees with opposing counsel's showing of substantial need, then counsel may request the Court disallow inspection, or allow inspection under terms and conditions deemed appropriate by the Court. The party requesting inspection of the list shall bear the burden of establishing substantial need.
9. No copies of Confidential Information shall be made except by or on behalf of counsel in this litigation for work product purposes, and for review by individuals listed in paragraph 5 above. Any such copies shall be made and used solely for purposes of this litigation.
10. During pendency of this litigation, counsel and other individuals listed in paragraph 5 above shall retain custody of Confidential Information, and copies made therefrom pursuant to paragraph 8 above.
11. A party may object to the designation of particular Confidential Information by giving written notice to the party designating the disputed information. The written notices shall identify the information to which the objection is made. If the parties cannot resolve the objection within ten (10) business days after the time the notice is received, it shall be the obligation of the party designating the information as confidential to file an appropriate motion requesting that the Court determine whether the disputed information should be subject to the terms of this Protective Order. If such a motion is timely filed, the disputed information shall be treated as confidential under the terms of this Protective Order until the Court rules on the motion. If the designating party fails to file such a motion within the prescribed time, the disputed information shall lose its designation as confidential and shall not thereafter be treated as confidential in accordance with this Protective Order. In connection with a motion filed under this provision, the party designating the information as confidential shall bear the burden of establishing that good cause exists for the disputed information to be treated as confidential.
12. In the event it is necessary for the Parties to file Confidential Information with the Court in connection with any proceeding or motion, the Confidential Information shall be filed in accordance with the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCiv.R 7.2 and 7.3.
13. The termination of this action shall not relieve counsel or other persons obligated hereunder from their responsibility to maintain the confidentiality of Confidential Information pursuant to this Protective Order, and the Court shall retain continuing jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this Protective Order, even after this action is terminated.
14. By agreeing to the entry of this Protective Order, the Parties adopt no position as to the authenticity or admissibility of documents produced subject to it. Neither the taking of any action in accordance with the provisions of this Protective Order, nor the failure to object thereto, shall be construed as a waiver of any claim or defense in this action.
15. Upon termination of this litigation, including any appeals, each Party's counsel shall continue to maintain confidentiality in the storage of any such records and/or destroy the confidential records.
16. Nothing in this Protective Order shall preclude any Party from filing a motion seeking further or different protection from the Court under Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or from filing a motion with respect to the manner in which Confidential Information shall be treated at trial.
DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 11th day of May, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
____________
Craig B. Shaffer
United States Magistrate Judge
STIPULATED AND AGREED TO:
____________
David A. Lane
Lauren L. Fontana
Killmer Lane & Newman, LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff
____________
Sonja S. McKenzie
Senter Goldfarb & Rice, LLC
Attorney for Defendant
____________
Patricia Nealey
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03291-MSK-CBS
MATTHEW PARROTT, a child, by his parents, ADRIENNE PARROTT and
ELVIN PARROTT, as next friends, Plaintiffs,
v.
CHERRY CREEK SCHOOL DISTRICT,
PATRICIA ANN NEALEY, Teacher, in her individual capacity, and
MIDGE EIDSON, Principal, in her individual capacity, Defendants.
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF COLORADO
COUNTY OF
___, swears or affirms and states under penalty of perjury:
1. I have read the Stipulation and Protective Order in Parrott v. Cherry Creek School District, et al., a copy of which is attached to this Affidavit.
2. I have been informed by ___, Esq., counsel for ___, that materials disclosed to me are Confidential Information as defined in the Stipulation and Protective Order.
3. I promise that I have not and will not divulge, or undertake to divulge to any person or recording device any Confidential Information shown or told to me except as authorized in the Stipulation and Protective Order. I will not use the Confidential Information for any purpose other than this litigation.
4. For the purpose of enforcing the terms of the Stipulation and Protective Order, I hereby submit myself to the jurisdiction of the court in the civil action referenced above.
5. I will abide by the terms of the Stipulation and Protective Order.
________
(Signature)
____________
(Print or Type Name)
Address:
____________
Telephone No.: (___)
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this ___ day of ___, 2012, by ___.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
________
Notary Public
My commission expires: ___
[SEAL]