From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parrish v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
May 24, 1993
853 S.W.2d 284 (Ark. 1993)

Opinion

CR 93-458

Opinion delivered May 24, 1993

1. APPEAL ERROR — ATTORNEY'S DUTY TO TIMELY FILE RECORD. — It is an attorney's duty to timely file the record. 2. APPEAL ERROR — RECORD FILED LATE — MOTION FOR RULE ON THE CLERK — IF ATTORNEY WILL CONCEDE FAULT OR SHOW OTHER GOOD CAUSE, MOTION WILL BE GRANTED. — Where the record was late because one of the orders of extension was not entered before the period for filing the record had expired, and the record was tendered more than seven months after the entry of judgment, appellants' motion for rule on the clerk was denied. 3. APPEAL ERROR — RULE ON THE CLERK WILL BE GRANTED IF GOOD CAUSE SHOWN. — Appellants' motion for rule on the clerk will be granted if the attorney will concede by affidavit that it was his fault that the record was not timely filed, or if other good cause is shown.

Motion for Rule on the Clerk denied.

Jon Alan Williams, for appellant.

No response.


The Clerk of the Court refused to docket this case when the record was presented. Appellants, by their attorney, Jon A. Williams, have filed a motion for a Rule on the Clerk. The motion contends that the record was timely filed. It was not timely filed, and we deny the motion.

[1-3] It is an attorney's duty to timely file the record. In this case the record was late because one of the orders of extension was not entered before the period for filing the record had expired. See Ark. R. App. P. 5. In addition, the record was tendered more than seven months after the entry of the judgment. See Ark. R. App. P. 5(b). If the attorney will concede by affidavit that it was his fault that the record was not timely filed, or if other good cause is shown, then the motion will be granted.


Summaries of

Parrish v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
May 24, 1993
853 S.W.2d 284 (Ark. 1993)
Case details for

Parrish v. State

Case Details

Full title:Ron PARRISH and Rose Parrish v. STATE of Arkansas

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: May 24, 1993

Citations

853 S.W.2d 284 (Ark. 1993)
853 S.W.2d 284

Citing Cases

Rayford v. State

[1, 2] We have consistently held that the appellant's attorney is responsible for filing the record, not the…