Parrish v. State

Full title: VINCENT PARRISH, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Apr 5, 2000

No. 4D97-4409 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Apr. 5, 2000)

Opinion

No. 4D97-4409.

Opinion filed April 5, 2000.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Robert B. Carney, Judge; L.T. Case No. 96-22277 CF 10 B.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Joseph R. Chloupek, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Gentry Denise Benjamin, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We deny appellant's motion for rehearing. However, we certify to the supreme court that our holding as to the window of opportunity to challenge Chapter 95-182, Laws of Florida on single subject grounds, as announced in Salters v. State, 731 So.2d 826 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), rev. granted, No. 95,663 (Fla. Dec. 3, 1999), conflicts with Thompson v. State, 708 So.2d 315 (Fla.2d DCA), rev. granted, 717 So.2d 538 (Fla. 1998). See State v. Thompson, No. 92,831, 1999 WL 1244518 (Fla. Dec. 22, 1999) (declining to rule on the applicable window period for challenging Chapter 95-182, Laws of Florida on single subject rule grounds).

GUNTHER, SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

NOT FINAL UNTIL THE DISPOSITION OF ANY TIMELY FILED MOTION FOR REHEARING.