From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parrish v. Sollecito

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 13, 2003
No. 01 Civ. 5420 (VM) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 13, 2003)

Opinion

No. 01 Civ. 5420 (VM)

March 13, 2003


ORDER


The Court notes that the Decision and Order in this case, dated February 10, 2003, contains certain inadvertent typographical errors. In particular, on page 5 of the Decision and Order, at lines 2-3, the word "Opportunity" should follow the word "Employment" and precede the word "Commission". On page 7, at line 14, the abbreviation "EEC" should be replaced by "EEOC". On page 18, at line 6, the word "not" should follow the word "does" and precede the word "agree". Finally, on page 30, at lines 3 5, the abbreviation "PI" should be replaced by "FI" and on line 3 "separate" should be replaced by "a single" and "managers" should be replaced by "manager". Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Decision and Order is reissued in the corrected form attached and incorporated by reference hereto, the page numbers and content of which are otherwise identical.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Parrish v. Sollecito

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 13, 2003
No. 01 Civ. 5420 (VM) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 13, 2003)
Case details for

Parrish v. Sollecito

Case Details

Full title:DONNA PARRISH, Plaintiff v. LOUIS SOLLECITO, individually, JAMES…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Mar 13, 2003

Citations

No. 01 Civ. 5420 (VM) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 13, 2003)