From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PARRIS v. MUST

United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia
Nov 16, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07cv53 (N.D.W. Va. Nov. 16, 2007)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07cv53.

November 16, 2007


ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S MOTION TO DISMISS


On April 16, 2007, the petitioner filed a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The respondents have not yet responded to the complaint. On November 14, 2007, the petitioner filed a motion to dismiss the case without prejudice (dkt. no. 13). Although the petitioner does not state any Rule of Civil Procedure in the motion, the Court construes it as a motion for voluntary dismissal under Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a).

Because the respondents have not yet filed a response to the complaint, this Court GRANTS plaintiff's motion to dismiss (doc. no. 13), DISMISSES this case WITHOUT PREJUDICE and directs the clerk to STRIKE this case from this Court docket. Because the petitioner has already filed for in forma pauperis status, however, the clerk will continue to collect the filing fee in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b).

The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this Order to the pro se plaintiff, certified mail, return receipt requested, and any counsel of record.


Summaries of

PARRIS v. MUST

United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia
Nov 16, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07cv53 (N.D.W. Va. Nov. 16, 2007)
Case details for

PARRIS v. MUST

Case Details

Full title:RANSOM PARRIS, Petitioner, v. DR. DAVID MUST, MARK WEGMAN, CPL. J. IGONS…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia

Date published: Nov 16, 2007

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07cv53 (N.D.W. Va. Nov. 16, 2007)