From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parra v. United Parcel Service

United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division
Jun 28, 2007
CASE NO. 3:07-CV-039 WCL-CAN (N.D. Ind. Jun. 28, 2007)

Opinion

CASE NO. 3:07-CV-039 WCL-CAN.

June 28, 2007


ORDER


On January 5, 2007, this matter was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) to Magistrate Judge Christopher Nuechterlein to conduct any hearings, including evidentiary hearings and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of Plaintiffs' complaint. On June 12, 2007, Magistrate Judge Christopher Nuechterlein issued his Report and Recommendation, recommending that the plaintiff's complaint be dismissed without prejudice, for failure to prosecute or comply with court orders. This Report and Recommendation also informed the parties that, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), they had ten days after being served with a copy of the Report and Recommendation to file written objections with the Clerk of the Court, and that failure to object may constitute a waiver of objection on appeal.

More than ten days have passed since the parties have been served with a copy of Magistrate Judge Nuechterlein's Report and Recommendation and no objections have been filed with the Clerk of the Court. Consequently, this court hereby ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Nuechterlein's Report and Recommendation, and ORDERS that the plaintiffs' Complaint be dismissed without prejudice, for failure to prosecute.


Summaries of

Parra v. United Parcel Service

United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division
Jun 28, 2007
CASE NO. 3:07-CV-039 WCL-CAN (N.D. Ind. Jun. 28, 2007)
Case details for

Parra v. United Parcel Service

Case Details

Full title:JESUS PARRA and LETICIA PARRA Plaintiffs, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE and…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division

Date published: Jun 28, 2007

Citations

CASE NO. 3:07-CV-039 WCL-CAN (N.D. Ind. Jun. 28, 2007)