From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parra v. Skolnik

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Aug 8, 2012
3:11-cv-00913-ECR (WGC) (D. Nev. Aug. 8, 2012)

Opinion

3:11-cv-00913-ECR (WGC)

08-08-2012

JULIO SMITH PARRA, Plaintiff, v. HOWARD SKOLNIK, et al., Defendants.

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING


MINUTES OF THE COURT

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE WILLIAM G. COBB , U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEPUTY CLERK: KATIE OGDEN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:

On June 7, 2012, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Early Production of "Giglio" Material. (Doc. # 13.) Defendants opposed. (Doc. # 16.)

In Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972), the Supreme Court held that when the reliability of a witness may be determinative of guilt or innocence in a criminal case, nondisclosure of the evidence regarding credibility falls within the ambits of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), which requires that the prosecution disclose exculpatory material to the defense.

Neither Giglio nor Brady are applicable to Plaintiffs civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Accordingly, Plaintiffs motion (Doc. # 13) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK

By: _______________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Parra v. Skolnik

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Aug 8, 2012
3:11-cv-00913-ECR (WGC) (D. Nev. Aug. 8, 2012)
Case details for

Parra v. Skolnik

Case Details

Full title:JULIO SMITH PARRA, Plaintiff, v. HOWARD SKOLNIK, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Aug 8, 2012

Citations

3:11-cv-00913-ECR (WGC) (D. Nev. Aug. 8, 2012)