From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parra v. Neven

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Sep 20, 2016
No. 69840 (Nev. App. Sep. 20, 2016)

Opinion

No. 69840

09-20-2016

JULIO SMITH PARRA, Appellant, v. DWIGHT NEVEN, WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Stefany Miley, Judge.

This appeal has been submitted for decision without oral argument. NRAP 34(f)(3). --------

Appellant Julio Parra argues the district court erred by denying his claim raised in his September 1, 2015, petition, that his parole eligibility dates were miscalculated and he should have been seen by the parole board earlier. We conclude the district court did not err by denying the petition as moot. Since filing the petition, Parra received a parole hearing on November 23, 2015, and was granted parole on several of his sentences. Thus, his claim was rendered moot. See NRS 213.10705; Niergarth v. Warden, 105 Nev. 26, 28-29, 768 P.2d 882, 883-84 (1989) (holding no statutory authority or case law permits retroactive grant of parole). Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

/s/_________, C.J.

Gibbons

/s/_________, J.

Tao

/s/_________, J.

Silver cc: Hon. Stefany Miley, District Judge

Julio Smith Parra

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Parra v. Neven

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Sep 20, 2016
No. 69840 (Nev. App. Sep. 20, 2016)
Case details for

Parra v. Neven

Case Details

Full title:JULIO SMITH PARRA, Appellant, v. DWIGHT NEVEN, WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Sep 20, 2016

Citations

No. 69840 (Nev. App. Sep. 20, 2016)