From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parra v. Barlos

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Sixth District, Lucas County
Apr 6, 1998
Court of Appeals No. L-98-1084 (Ohio Ct. App. Apr. 6, 1998)

Opinion

Court of Appeals No. L-98-1084.

Decided: April 6, 1998.

Eugene A. Parra, pro se.

* * * * *


DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY

* * * * *


Relator, Eugene A. Parra, filed the above named action requesting this court to compel respondents, "Harry Barlos, Lucas County Clerk of Courts," and "Sandra Corp, Lucas County Court Reporter" to produce copies of certain documents in the record for case number CR86-7172. Although not identified as such, we will treat relator's request as a Complaint for Mandamus.

We initially note that 6th Dist.Loc.App.R. 6 requires that a party instituting an original action must "file a praecipe directing the clerk of the court of appeals to serve a copy of the complaint on each other party at the addresses listed in the praecipe." In addition, relator's pleading is not correctly formatted to establish the requirements of an action in mandamus.

Accordingly, relator's action is dismissed at relator's costs.

_______________________________ George M. Glasser, J. JUDGE

_______________________________ James R. Sherck, J. JUDGE

_______________________________ Richard W. Knepper, J. JUDGE

CONCUR.


Summaries of

Parra v. Barlos

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Sixth District, Lucas County
Apr 6, 1998
Court of Appeals No. L-98-1084 (Ohio Ct. App. Apr. 6, 1998)
Case details for

Parra v. Barlos

Case Details

Full title:Eugene A. Parra, ex rel., Relator v. Harry Barlos, Lucas County Clerk of…

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio, Sixth District, Lucas County

Date published: Apr 6, 1998

Citations

Court of Appeals No. L-98-1084 (Ohio Ct. App. Apr. 6, 1998)

Citing Cases

State v. Johnson

[T]he original action shall proceed as any civil action under the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure as may be…