From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parno v. Kane

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Feb 3, 2023
1:16-CV-01949 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 3, 2023)

Opinion

1:16-CV-01949

02-03-2023

GLENN A. PARNO, Plaintiff, v. KATHLEEN KANE et al., Defendants.


ORDER

JUDGE SYLVIA H. RAMBO

AND NOW, this 3rd day of February, 2023, upon consideration of the parties' motions for summary judgment, and in accordance with the accompanying memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Glenn A. Parno's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 101) is DENIED and Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 92) is GRANTED as to Defendants William Nemetz, David Peifer, Braden Cook, and Renee Martin and DENIED as to Defendant Kathleen Kane.

Parno's Equal Protection claims against Nemetz, Peifer, Cook, and Martin are DISMISSED with prejudice.


Summaries of

Parno v. Kane

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Feb 3, 2023
1:16-CV-01949 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 3, 2023)
Case details for

Parno v. Kane

Case Details

Full title:GLENN A. PARNO, Plaintiff, v. KATHLEEN KANE et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 3, 2023

Citations

1:16-CV-01949 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 3, 2023)