From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parnell v. Win

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 3, 2018
No. 2:18-cv-0220 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2018)

Opinion

No. 2:18-cv-0220 KJN P

04-03-2018

RICKY PARNELL, Plaintiff, v. DR. K. WIN, DR. CHIN, Defendants.


ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By an order filed February 21, 2018, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to the court, within thirty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendants. That thirty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court's order.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and

IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: April 3, 2018

/s/_________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE /parn0220.fusm


Summaries of

Parnell v. Win

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 3, 2018
No. 2:18-cv-0220 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2018)
Case details for

Parnell v. Win

Case Details

Full title:RICKY PARNELL, Plaintiff, v. DR. K. WIN, DR. CHIN, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 3, 2018

Citations

No. 2:18-cv-0220 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2018)