From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parmes v. First Cent. Credit Union

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi-Edinburg
Mar 7, 2024
No. 13-24-00027-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 7, 2024)

Opinion

13-24-00027-CV

03-07-2024

NAHESI PARMES, Appellant, v. FIRST CENTRAL CREDIT UNION, Appellee.


On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 of McLennan County, Texas.

Before Benavides, Tijerina, and Silva Justices.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JAIME TIJERINA, Justice.

On December 1, 2023, appellant Nahesi Parmes filed a pro se notice of appeal from an order granting summary judgment in trial court cause number 20221073CV1. On December 1, 2023, the Clerk of the Court requested appellant to pay the $205.00 filing fee within ten days. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 ("A party who is not excused by statute or these rules from paying costs must pay-at the time an item is presented for filing- whatever fees are required by statute or Supreme Court order. The appellate court may enforce this rule by any order that is just."); Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 51.207 (delineating the required fees and costs in an appellate court).

This case is before the Court on transfer from the Tenth Court of Appeals pursuant to a docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 73.001.

On December 21, 2023, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the filing fee was past due and informed him that the appeal would be dismissed if the filing fee was not paid. See id. R. 42.3(b), (c). On January 19, 2024, the Clerk again advised appellant that the filing fee was past due and informed him that the appeal would be dismissed if the filing fee was not paid. See id. R. 42.3(b), (c).

To date, appellant has neither paid the filing fee for the appeal nor responded to the Clerk of the Court's notices. This Court has the authority to dismiss an appeal because the appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the appellate rules, a court order, or a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other action within a specified time. See id. R. 42.3(b), (c); Smith v. DC Civil Constr., LLC, 521 S.W.3d 75, 76 (Tex. App.-San Antonio 2017, no pet.). Here, appellant has not paid the appellate filing fee and has not otherwise responded to the Clerk's notices. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c).


Summaries of

Parmes v. First Cent. Credit Union

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi-Edinburg
Mar 7, 2024
No. 13-24-00027-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 7, 2024)
Case details for

Parmes v. First Cent. Credit Union

Case Details

Full title:NAHESI PARMES, Appellant, v. FIRST CENTRAL CREDIT UNION, Appellee.

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi-Edinburg

Date published: Mar 7, 2024

Citations

No. 13-24-00027-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 7, 2024)