From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parmenter v. Yager

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jun 29, 2012
Civil No. 6:07-CV-6259-TC (D. Or. Jun. 29, 2012)

Opinion

Civil No. 6:07-CV-6259-TC

06-29-2012

BARBARA K. PARMENTER, Plaintiff, v. TIMOTHY J. YAGER et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Magistrate Judge Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on June 6, 2012. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452,454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo. I find no error.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation.

_________________

Ann Aiken, United States District Judge


Summaries of

Parmenter v. Yager

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jun 29, 2012
Civil No. 6:07-CV-6259-TC (D. Or. Jun. 29, 2012)
Case details for

Parmenter v. Yager

Case Details

Full title:BARBARA K. PARMENTER, Plaintiff, v. TIMOTHY J. YAGER et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Jun 29, 2012

Citations

Civil No. 6:07-CV-6259-TC (D. Or. Jun. 29, 2012)