From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parmar v. City of Aurora

United States District Court, District of Colorado
Aug 18, 2022
Civil Action 20-cv-02801-CNS-NRN (D. Colo. Aug. 18, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 20-cv-02801-CNS-NRN

08-18-2022

P.J. PARMAR Plaintiff v. CITY OF AURORA, COLORADO JUSTIN E. HENDERSON Defendants

David Lane Andrew McNulty Counsel Isabelle Evans Peter Morales Bernard Woessner Ashley Hernandez-Schlagel Counsel


David Lane Andrew McNulty Counsel

Isabelle Evans Peter Morales Bernard Woessner Ashley Hernandez-Schlagel Counsel

COURTROOM MINUTES

ORAL ARGUMENT

Court in Session: 8:59 a.m.

Appearance of counsel. Also present on behalf of the plaintiff is intern Jacob Alcock.

Argument given on [46] Defendants' Motion and Brief in Support of Summary Judgment by Mr.

Woessner, Ms. Evans and Mr. McNulty with questions from the Court.

The Court makes findings of fact, conclusions of law. As outlined on the record it is

ORDERED: [46] Defendants' Motion and Brief in Support of Summary Judgment is GRANTED.

Plaintiff's claims are dismissed and judgment is to enter in favor of the defendants.

Court in Recess: 10:03 a.m. Hearing concluded. Total time in Court: 01:04


Summaries of

Parmar v. City of Aurora

United States District Court, District of Colorado
Aug 18, 2022
Civil Action 20-cv-02801-CNS-NRN (D. Colo. Aug. 18, 2022)
Case details for

Parmar v. City of Aurora

Case Details

Full title:P.J. PARMAR Plaintiff v. CITY OF AURORA, COLORADO JUSTIN E. HENDERSON…

Court:United States District Court, District of Colorado

Date published: Aug 18, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 20-cv-02801-CNS-NRN (D. Colo. Aug. 18, 2022)