From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parlor Car De Luxe Coach Co. v. Atlantic City

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 3, 1930
146 A. 319 (N.J. 1930)

Opinion

Submitted October 26, 1929 —

Decided February 3, 1930.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported sub nomine Peoples Rapid Transit Co. v. Atlantic City, 105 N.J.L. 286.

For the appellant, Cole Cole.

For the respondent, Joseph L. Perskie.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Minturn in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, KALISCH, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Parlor Car De Luxe Coach Co. v. Atlantic City

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 3, 1930
146 A. 319 (N.J. 1930)
Case details for

Parlor Car De Luxe Coach Co. v. Atlantic City

Case Details

Full title:PARLOR CAR DE LUXE COACH CO., APPELLANT, v. ATLANTIC CITY, RESPONDENT

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Feb 3, 1930

Citations

146 A. 319 (N.J. 1930)
106 N.J.L. 587

Citing Cases

State of Arizona v. Price

Courts, state and federal, have uniformly upheld and sustained, under the police power, such regulatory…

City of Newark v. Charlton Holding Co.

Here indeed the words become apt that "While such regulation may be considered drastic in its operation, the…