From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parkview Edge Properties, LLC v. Dumlao

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 2, 2014
No. C 14-4899 PJH (N.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2014)

Summary

finding that monetary sanctions against the defendant was not appropriate given the defendant's pro se status and because it was unclear whether the defendant even knew he could be sanctioned thousands of dollars

Summary of this case from Blazheiev v. Ubisoft Toronto Inc.

Opinion

No. C 14-4899 PJH

12-02-2014

PARKVIEW EDGE PROPERTIES, LLC, Plaintiff, v. JUDITH E. DUMLAO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; ORDER REMANDING CASE

The court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler's Report and Recommendation regarding plaintiff's motion to remand. Defendants filed no objections within the time allowed under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The court finds the Report correct, well-reasoned and thorough, and adopts it in every respect. Accordingly, plaintiff's motion to remand the case to the Superior Court of California, County of Alameda, is GRANTED.

In addition, because this is the second time this case has been improperly removed and subsequently remanded for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, it is further ORDERED that the clerk not accept for filing, without prior approval of a judge of this court, any case removed by Judith E. Dumlao, Tommy U. Dumlao, Elaine Altares Escobal, or any other person or entity, involving the unlawful detainer action originally filed in Alameda County Superior Court on September 3, 2014 as Case No. HG14739136.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 2, 2014

/s/_________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Parkview Edge Properties, LLC v. Dumlao

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 2, 2014
No. C 14-4899 PJH (N.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2014)

finding that monetary sanctions against the defendant was not appropriate given the defendant's pro se status and because it was unclear whether the defendant even knew he could be sanctioned thousands of dollars

Summary of this case from Blazheiev v. Ubisoft Toronto Inc.

granting motion to remand unlawful detainer action because the defendants "cannot invoke diversity jurisdiction because they are citizens of California"

Summary of this case from Bank of New York Mellon v. Vo
Case details for

Parkview Edge Properties, LLC v. Dumlao

Case Details

Full title:PARKVIEW EDGE PROPERTIES, LLC, Plaintiff, v. JUDITH E. DUMLAO, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 2, 2014

Citations

No. C 14-4899 PJH (N.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2014)

Citing Cases

Blazheiev v. Ubisoft Toronto Inc.

First, at this juncture in the proceedings, the Court cannot say that Plaintiff's claims are frivolous or…

Bank of New York Mellon v. Vo

Because Plaintiff has timely objected to Defendants' violation of the forum defendant rule, the Court…