From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parks v. USAA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 24, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02016-PAB-MJW (D. Colo. Sep. 24, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-02016-PAB-MJW

09-24-2012

LYNDSEY PARKS, representative of a class of persons insured with USAA, Plaintiffs, v. USAA and AUTO INJURY SOLUTIONS (AIS), a Delaware corporation, Defendants.


MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Judge Philip A. Brimmer

This matter is before the Court on defendant Auto Injury Solutions, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 8]. On September 24, 2012, plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint [Docket No. 39]. Thus, the Amended Complaint became the operative pleading in this action, and the Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 8] is directed to an inoperative, superseded pleading. See, e.g., Gilles v. United States, 906 F.2d 1386, 1389 (10th Cir. 1990) ("a pleading that has been amended under Rule 15(a) supersedes the pleading it modifies") (internal quotation marks omitted). As such, the motion to dismiss is moot. It is

ORDERED that defendant Auto Injury Solutions, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 8] is DENIED as moot.


Summaries of

Parks v. USAA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 24, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02016-PAB-MJW (D. Colo. Sep. 24, 2012)
Case details for

Parks v. USAA

Case Details

Full title:LYNDSEY PARKS, representative of a class of persons insured with USAA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Sep 24, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-02016-PAB-MJW (D. Colo. Sep. 24, 2012)