From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parks v. State

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Apr 25, 2006
Case No. 06-2156-CM (D. Kan. Apr. 25, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 06-2156-CM.

April 25, 2006


ORDER


This matter is before the court on plaintiff's application to file this action without payment of fees or security (doc. 2).

Section 1915 of Title 28, United States Code allows the court to authorize the commencement of a civil action "without prepayment of fees or security therefor, by a person who submits an affidavit that . . . the person is unable to pay such fees or give security therefor." "Proceeding in forma pauperis in a civil case `is a privilege, not a right — fundamental or otherwise.'" The decision to grant or deny in forma pauperis status under section 1915 lies within the sound discretion of the trial court.

Barnett ex rel. Barnett v. Northwest School, No. 00-2499, 2000 WL 1909625 (D. Kan. Dec. 26, 2000) (quoting White v. Colorado, 157 F.3d 1226, 1233 (10th Cir. 1998) cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1008 (1999)).

Id. (citing Cabrera v. Horgas, No. 98-4231, 1999 WL 241783, at *1 (10th Cir. April 23, 1999) (citations omitted)).

Plaintiff's affidavit of financial status is incomplete. Plaintiff has failed to provide any personal data, i.e., his age or address. Plaintiff has also failed to provide any information regarding current or past employment. The court finds it highly unlikely that plaintiff has never been employed. Other than electricity and rent, plaintiff has not indicated that he has any other financial obligations, which would include grocery expense. Again, the court finds it highly unlikely the plaintiff does not spend some amount of money on groceries.

Based on the sparse information provided by plaintiff, the court is unable to determine whether plaintiff has sufficient financial resources to pay the court's filing fees. The court, therefore, orders plaintiff to provide a supplemental financial affidavit which includes the above-mentioned information, as well as any other matters which might be pertinent to the court in its determination of whether to allow plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis in this case no later than May 5, 2006. Following receipt of this information, the court will consider plaintiff's application.

Copies of this order shall served upon on pro se plaintiff by regular and certified mail.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Parks v. State

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Apr 25, 2006
Case No. 06-2156-CM (D. Kan. Apr. 25, 2006)
Case details for

Parks v. State

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY OWEN PARKS, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF KANSAS, CITY OF SHAWNEE…

Court:United States District Court, D. Kansas

Date published: Apr 25, 2006

Citations

Case No. 06-2156-CM (D. Kan. Apr. 25, 2006)