From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parks v. Rolfing

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 31, 2015
No. 2:15-cv-1505 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 31, 2015)

Opinion

No. 2:15-cv-1505 CKD P

07-31-2015

KENNETH WAYNE PARKS, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY ROLFING, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied without prejudice to renewal at a later stage of the litigation.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel (ECF No. 6) is denied without prejudice to renewal. Dated: July 31, 2015

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2/park1505.31


Summaries of

Parks v. Rolfing

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 31, 2015
No. 2:15-cv-1505 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 31, 2015)
Case details for

Parks v. Rolfing

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH WAYNE PARKS, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY ROLFING, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 31, 2015

Citations

No. 2:15-cv-1505 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 31, 2015)