From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parks v. People

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 11, 2021
1:21-cv-01010-NE-JLT (HC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2021)

Opinion

1:21-cv-01010-NE-JLT (HC)

08-11-2021

ARCHIE PARKS, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Respondent.


ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

(DOC. 8)

JENNIFER L. THURSTON CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

On August 6, 2021, Petitioner filed what appears to be a motion to appoint counsel and a duplicate of his initial habeas petition. (Doc. 8.) There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See, e.g., Anderson v. Heinze, 258 F.2d 479, 481 (9th Cir. 1958); Mitchell v. Wyrick, 727 F.2d 773, 774 (8th Cir. 1984). However, Title 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B) authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case if “the interests of justice so require.” See Rule 8(c), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. In the present case, the Court does not find that the interests of justice require the appointment of counsel at the present time. Accordingly, Petitioner's request for appointment of counsel is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Parks v. People

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 11, 2021
1:21-cv-01010-NE-JLT (HC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2021)
Case details for

Parks v. People

Case Details

Full title:ARCHIE PARKS, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 11, 2021

Citations

1:21-cv-01010-NE-JLT (HC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2021)