In Parks v. Murray, 109 N.Y. 646, there was a motion to dismiss the appeal. It was founded upon the omission to comply with an order of the Supreme Court, made December 19, 1887, directing the appellant to file a new undertaking.
Summary of this case from Howey v. Lake Shore M.S.R. Co.Argued April 10, 1888
Decided April 17, 1888
Kurzman Yeoman for motion.
John W. Brainsby opposed.
Per Curiam opinion for denial of motion.
All concur.
Motion denied.
In Parks v. Murray, 109 N.Y. 646, there was a motion to dismiss the appeal. It was founded upon the omission to comply with an order of the Supreme Court, made December 19, 1887, directing the appellant to file a new undertaking.
Summary of this case from Howey v. Lake Shore M.S.R. Co.Full title:WILLIAM F. PARKS, Appellant, v . MARGARET A. MURRAY et al., Respondents
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Apr 17, 1888
In this, the creditor is in error. All that is necessary to perfect the appeal to the Appellate Term, is the…
Cupo v. McGoldrickthere would have been serious doubt that the Administrator, in the exercise of such reserve power, could…