From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parks v. Dzurenda

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Aug 16, 2017
No. 71526 (Nev. App. Aug. 16, 2017)

Opinion

No. 71526

08-16-2017

MICHAEL ALLEN PARKS, Appellant, v. JAMES E. DZURENDA, DIRECTOR; AND HAROLD WICKHAM, WARDEN, Respondents.


ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

Michael Allen Parks appeals from an order of the district court denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. First Judicial District Court, Carson City; James E. Wilson, Judge.

This appeal has been submitted for decision without oral argument. NRAP 34(f)(3). --------

Parks contends the district court erred in denying his claim that the Nevada Department of Corrections' failure to apply statutory credits to his parole eligibility violated his equal-protection rights. Parks argued the Legislature was arbitrary and irrational when it allowed disparate application of statutory credits to parole eligibility based solely on when a crime was committed or on its classification as a category A or B felony.

All persons similarly situated are entitled to equal protection of the law. U.S. Const. amend. XIV, §1; Gaines v. State, 116 Nev. 359, 371, 998 P.2d 166, 173 (2000). Offenders who commit crimes at different times, see Weaver v. Graham, 450 U.S. 24, 31-33 (1981); Goldsworthy v. Hannifin, 86 Nev. 252, 255, 468 P.2d 350, 352 (1970), or who fall into different felony classifications are not similarly situated such that they need not be treated equally. Even if they were, where, as in the instant case, a classification is not based on a suspect class or does not affect fundamental rights, Glauner v. Miller, 184 F.3d 1053, 1054 (9th Cir. 1999) ("[P]risoners are not a suspect class and there is no fundamental constitutional right to parole."), this court will uphold the legislation so long as "the challenged classification is rationally related to a legitimate governmental interest." Gaines, 116 Nev. at 371, 998 P.2d at 173. Parks has not demonstrated there was no rational basis for applying credits in a different manner based upon offense classification and offense date. We therefore conclude the district court did not err in denying the petition. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

/s/_________, C.J.

Silver

/s/_________, J.

Tao

/s/_________, J.

Gibbons cc: Hon. James E. Wilson, District Judge

Michael Allen Parks

Attorney General/Carson City

Carson City Clerk


Summaries of

Parks v. Dzurenda

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Aug 16, 2017
No. 71526 (Nev. App. Aug. 16, 2017)
Case details for

Parks v. Dzurenda

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL ALLEN PARKS, Appellant, v. JAMES E. DZURENDA, DIRECTOR; AND HAROLD…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Aug 16, 2017

Citations

No. 71526 (Nev. App. Aug. 16, 2017)