From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parks v. Casino

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 10, 2016
2:09-cv-02365-RCJ-RJJ (D. Nev. Mar. 10, 2016)

Opinion

2:09-cv-02365-RCJ-RJJ

03-10-2016

EDWARD FAYE PARKS, Plaintiff, v. EDGEWATER CASINO et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, an inmate in Arizona proceeding pro se, submitted a Civil Rights Complaint Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 1, 2010, the Court dismissed the case for failure to comply with the Court's order to submit a new Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The Ninth Circuit found Plaintiff's appeal to be frivolous and dismissed it for failure to perfect the appeal. Plaintiff has now submitted a Motion to Request Investigation (ECF No. 19) and a Motion to Reopen the Case (ECF No. 20). Plaintiff alleges he was unlawfully imprisoned and that he is facing serious medical issues in prison. The Court finds no reason to grant Plaintiff's motions. The motions are denied. /// /// /// /// ///

CONCLUSION

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Request Investigation (ECF No. 19) is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Reopen the Case (ECF No. 20) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: This 10th day of March, 2016.

/s/_________

ROBERT C. JONES

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Parks v. Casino

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 10, 2016
2:09-cv-02365-RCJ-RJJ (D. Nev. Mar. 10, 2016)
Case details for

Parks v. Casino

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD FAYE PARKS, Plaintiff, v. EDGEWATER CASINO et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 10, 2016

Citations

2:09-cv-02365-RCJ-RJJ (D. Nev. Mar. 10, 2016)