In these circumstances and under these findings it is quite clear that the divorce court had not only the authority but the duty to enter the amendment to the divorce decree so that the record correctly reflected his decision in the case. Taliaferro v. Bates (1927), 123 Okl. 59, 252 P. 845; Peoples Electric Co-op v. Broughton (1942), 191 Okl. 229, 127 P.2d 850; Adamson v. Brady (1947), 199 Okl. 55, 182 P.2d 748; Mabry v. Baird (1950), 203 Okl. 212, 219 P.2d 234; Hawks v. McCormack (1937), 180 Okl. 569, 71 P.2d 724; Parks v. Briggs (Okl. 1954), 268 P.2d 283; Woodmansee v. Woodmansee (1929), 137 Okl. 112, 278 P. 278. The plaintiff claims herein that the Bank, the Spragues, Westgate (owned by the Spragues) and Crane conspired to deprive him of his equity or rights in 13 1/2 shares of Westgate stock and a promissory note from Westgate to him by criminal or unlawful means.
It is the duty of a trial court, in a proper evidentiary proceeding and upon sufficient proof, to cause to be entered orders and judgments which have failed to be recorded. Cf. Feagin v. Fife, 198 Okla. 57, 175 P.2d 81, 84 [1946]; Parks v. Briggs, Okla., 268 P.2d 283, 284-285 [1954]. An adversary proceeding to determine the sweep of the 1977 decision is also essential to meet the applicable due process standards.
Here the illegal charges included were neither trivial nor unintentional. Upon the authority of the following cases, we hold the resale deed to the defendant in error to be void. Carman v. McMahan, 198 Okla. 367, 178 P.2d 626; Dyer v. Dalton, 197 Okla. 601, 174 P.2d 252; Parks v. Briggs, Okla., 268 P.2d 283; House v. Mainka, 196 Okla. 174, 163 P.2d 225; Allgood v. Wetsel, Okla., 275 P.2d 317; Harris v. Dungan, 199 Okla. 350, 185 P.2d 949; Lind v. McKinley, supra; Reynolds v. Clemmens, 199 Okla. 153, 184 P.2d 758; Rogers v. Sheppard, 200 Okla. 203, 192 P.2d 643; Sarkeys v. Evans, 197 Okla. 304, 170 P.2d 229; Lawrence v. Ayres, supra; Smith v. Barry, 200 Okla. 619, 198 P.2d 400; Whitehead v. Garrett, 199 Okla. 278, 185 P.2d 686; Williamson v. Hart, 199 Okla. 328, 186 P.2d 71; Chapman v. Calhoun, 204 Okla. 63, 226 P.2d 974; Schultz v. Evans, 204 Okla. 209, 228 P.2d 626; North v. Kidd, 204 Okla. 623, 232 P.2d 931; Anderson v. Hill, 205 Okla. 561, 239 P.2d 1016; Sarkeys v. Simpson, 206 Okla. 425, 244 P.2d 311; Boone v. Claxton, supra; Parks v. Replogle, 207 Okla. 536, 251 P.2d 794; Jenkins v. Frederick, 208 Okla. 583, 257 P.2d 1058, and Young v. Boswell, 191 Okla. 680, 134 P.2d 592. This cause is reversed and remanded with directions to enter judgment for the plaintiffs in error herein upon
October 19, 1950, upon a trial before respondent herein, the Honorable Kenneth Hughes, judgment was rendered in favor of the defendant, R.L. Briggs and against Oscar Lonnie Parks, quieting title to the land in R.L. Briggs and holding his possession of the land as rightful and quieting his title thereto. Under this judgment the accounting prayed for by the petitioner here, was unnecessary. From that judgment Oscar Lonnie Parks appealed to this Court, being case No. 34,968 in this Court, and on February 9, 1954, this Court reversed the judgment of the trial court and remanded the case to the District Court with directions, Parks v. Briggs, Okla., 268 P.2d 283. April 8, 1954, mandate was issued whereby the respondent was commanded: "* * * to cause such reversal with directions to show of record in your court and to issue such process and take such other and further action as may be in accord with right and justice and said opinion."