From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parks v. Boyd

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Apr 5, 2022
1:22-cv-41 (E.D. Tenn. Apr. 5, 2022)

Opinion

1:22-cv-41

04-05-2022

BRUCE PARKS, JR., Plaintiff, v. BERT BOYD, A.W. COBBLE, OFFICER CUTTER, and CPL. COLEMAN, Defendants.


Lee, Magistrate Judge.

JUDGMENT ORDER

CHARLES E. ATCHLEY JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

For the reasons set forth in the memorandum opinion filed herewith:

1. Even liberally construing the complaint filings in favor of Plaintiff, they fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 as to any named Defendant;

2. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A;

3. Because the Court CERTIFIED in the memorandum opinion that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, should Plaintiff file a notice of appeal, he is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 24; and

4. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Parks v. Boyd

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Apr 5, 2022
1:22-cv-41 (E.D. Tenn. Apr. 5, 2022)
Case details for

Parks v. Boyd

Case Details

Full title:BRUCE PARKS, JR., Plaintiff, v. BERT BOYD, A.W. COBBLE, OFFICER CUTTER…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee

Date published: Apr 5, 2022

Citations

1:22-cv-41 (E.D. Tenn. Apr. 5, 2022)