From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parks v. Abdur-Rahman

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 22, 2021
2:19-cv-01589-KJM-JDP(PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-cv-01589-KJM-JDP(PC)

09-22-2021

KENNETH WAYNE PARKS, Plaintiff, v. SALAHUDDIN ABDUR-RAHMAN AND RANDALL LANKFORD, Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On August 10, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 10, 2021, are adopted.

2. Plaintiffs motions to stay, ECF Nos. 57, 62, & 72, are DENIED as moot.

3. Defendants' motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 65, is GRANTED.

4. Judgment be entered in defendants' favor and against plaintiff.

5. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.


Summaries of

Parks v. Abdur-Rahman

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 22, 2021
2:19-cv-01589-KJM-JDP(PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2021)
Case details for

Parks v. Abdur-Rahman

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH WAYNE PARKS, Plaintiff, v. SALAHUDDIN ABDUR-RAHMAN AND RANDALL…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 22, 2021

Citations

2:19-cv-01589-KJM-JDP(PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2021)