Parks-Davis Auctioneers, Inc. v. Ls&sW Tong Serv., Inc.

2 Citing cases

  1. Sloan v. Passman

    536 S.W.2d 575 (Tex. Civ. App. 1976)   Cited 13 times

    For example, Tex.R.Civ.P. 376 requires that the appellant Shall promptly file with the clerk a copy of the written direction to prepare the transcript. Parks-Davis Auctioneers, Inc. v. L W Tong Service, Inc., 496 S.W.2d 679 (Tex.Civ.App. — Corpus Christi 1973, no writ). Since an appellant seeking a motion for an extension of time is required to set forth a reasonable explanation for not timely filing the transcript (21c), it is also implicit that an appellant is required to reasonably explain his actions or inactions during the entire sixty-day period, including a reasonable explanation for an extraordinary delay in requesting preparation of the transcript.

  2. Embry v. Bel-Aire Corp.

    497 S.W.2d 466 (Tex. Civ. App. 1973)   Cited 2 times

    Appellant relies on Hill Chemicals Co. v. Miller, 462 S .W.2d 568 (Tex.1971); Duncan v. Duncan, 371 S.W.2d 873 (Tex.1963), and Anzaldua v. Richardson, 279 S.W.2d 169 (Tex.Civ.App., 1955, no writ). The same contention made by appellant was made by appellants and rejected recently by the 13th Court of Civil Appeal in Parks-Davis Auctioneers, Inc., et al. v. L & W Tong Service, Inc., 496 S.W.2d 679 (Tex.Civ.App., Corpus Christi, 1973). In Parks-Davis Auctioneers, Inc., Supra, the court considered a motion for extension of time to file the transcript and statement of facts.