Opinion
2022-2173
05-16-2024
PARKERVISION, INC., Appellant v. KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor
Jason Scott Charkow, Daignault Iyer LLP, Vienna, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by Ronald M. Daignault, Chandran Iyer, Richard Juang. Michael S. Forman, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by Peter J. Ayers, Benjamin T. Hickman, Farheena Yasmeen Rasheed.
This disposition is nonprecedential.
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2021- 00346.
Jason Scott Charkow, Daignault Iyer LLP, Vienna, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by Ronald M. Daignault, Chandran Iyer, Richard Juang.
Michael S. Forman, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by Peter J. Ayers, Benjamin T. Hickman, Farheena Yasmeen Rasheed.
JUDGMENT
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM.
(LOURIE, DYK, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.