Parkervision, Inc. v. TCL Indus. Holdings Co.

Full title: PARKERVISION, INC., Appellant v. TCL INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS CO., LTD., LG…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Jun 5, 2024

No. 2023-1415 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 5, 2024)

Opinion

2023-1417

06-05-2024

PARKERVISION, INC., Appellant v. TCL INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS CO., LTD., LG ELECTRONICS INC., Appellees

JASON SCOTT CHARKOW, Daignault Iyer LLP, Vienna, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by RONALD M. DAIGNAULT, CHANDRAN IYER. EDWARD JOHN MAYLE, Kilpatrick Townsend &Stockton LLP, Denver, CO, argued for appellees. TCL Industries Holdings Co., Ltd. also represented by KRISTOPHER L. REED, Dallas, TX. DAVID S. CHUN, Ropes & Gray LLP, East Palo Alto, CA, for LG Electronics Inc. Also represented by STEVEN PEPE, MATTHEW R. SHAPIRO, New York, NY; SCOTT S. TAYLOR, Boston, MA.

PER CURIAM.

This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2021-00985, IPR2022-00246.

JASON SCOTT CHARKOW, Daignault Iyer LLP, Vienna, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by RONALD M. DAIGNAULT, CHANDRAN IYER.

EDWARD JOHN MAYLE, Kilpatrick Townsend &Stockton LLP, Denver, CO, argued for appellees. TCL Industries Holdings Co., Ltd. also represented by KRISTOPHER L. REED, Dallas, TX.

DAVID S. CHUN, Ropes & Gray LLP, East Palo Alto, CA, for LG Electronics Inc. Also represented by STEVEN PEPE, MATTHEW R. SHAPIRO, New York, NY; SCOTT S. TAYLOR, Boston, MA.

JUDGMENT

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM.

(PROST, TARANTO, and CHEN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.