Parker v. Verizon Pennsylvania, Inc.

Full title: RAY A. PARKER, and CAULETTE PARKER, his wife, Plaintiff, v. VERIZON…

Court: United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 30, 2007

07cv0435, ELECTRONICALLY FILED (W.D. Pa. Nov. 30, 2007)

Opinion

07cv0435, ELECTRONICALLY FILED.

November 30, 2007

Order of Court

ARTHUR SCHWAB, District Judge

And now, this 30^th day of November, 2007, for the reasons set forth in the foregoing Memorandum Opinion on Summary Judgment, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

(1) Defendants' motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 26) is GRANTED as to plaintiff's claims of discrimination and retaliation under the ADA and the FMLA.

(2) The Court will not rule upon defendants' motion for summary judgment as it relates to plaintiffs' state law claim of trespass against the Oneskos.

(3) This case will be dismissed with prejudice as to plaintiff's claims of discrimination and retaliation but without prejudice as to plaintiffs' claim for trespass.

(4) Judgment is hereby entered in favor of defendant Verizon and against plaintiff.

(5) The Clerk shall mark the docket closed.