From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parker v. Tinsley

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 20, 2010
32 So. 3d 748 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

Opinion

No. 1D09-5267.

April 20, 2010.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County. Gary Bergosh, Judge.

Oscar J. Locklin of Locklin, Jones Saba, P.A., Milton, for Appellants.

Paul Tinsley and Susan Tinsley, pro se, Appellees.


Appellants seek review of the trial court's order granting appellees' motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540. We agree that the trial court committed reversible error by granting the motion because it sought to correct judicial error which is beyond the scope of rule 1.540. See Curbelo v. Ullman, 571 So.2d 443, 444-45 (Fla. 1990) (holding that rule 1.540 does not provide relief from judicial error which must be corrected by way of a motion for new trial or rehearing pursuant Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.530 or an appeal). Accordingly, we reverse the trial court's order granting relief under rule 1.540.

REVERSED.

WEBSTER, LEWIS, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Parker v. Tinsley

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 20, 2010
32 So. 3d 748 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)
Case details for

Parker v. Tinsley

Case Details

Full title:Wallace L. PARKER and wife Sonja Y. Parker, Appellants, v. Paul TINSLEY…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Apr 20, 2010

Citations

32 So. 3d 748 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)