From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parker v. Maus

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 27, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01777-REB-CBS (D. Colo. Sep. 27, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01777-REB-CBS

09-27-2012

TRENTON T. PARKER, Plaintiff, v. DANIEL S. MAUS, in his individual and official capacity, ELIZABETH B. STROBEL, individually and in her official capacity, BRUCE T. BARKER, in his individual and official capacity, STEPHANIE L. ARRIES, in her individual and official capacity, JOHN COOK, in his individual and official capacity, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO In Re Case No. 07-cv-189; and Case No. 11-cv-19, IN WELD COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO, Defendants.


AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT

This Final Judgment is entered pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) and in accordance with the Order Adopting Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge [#44] entered by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on September 25, 2012, and the subsequent Order entered September 27, 2012, which orders are incorporated herein by this reference.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That Defendants Barker, Arries, and Cook's Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (ECF No. 23) Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) [#25], filed December 30, 2011, is GRANTED;

2. That Defendants Daniel S. Maus' and Elizabeth B. Strobel's Motion To Dismiss Amended Complaint (ECF #23) Pursuant to FRCP 12(B)(1) and 12(B)(6) [#28], filed January 3, 2012, is GRANTED;

3. That plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED as follows:

a. The claims against defendants Maus and Strobel in both their official and individual capacities are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;
b. The claims against defendants Barker, Arries, and Cook in their official capacities are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;
c. The claims against defendants Barker, Arries, and Cook in their individual capacities are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and
d. The claims against the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Weld, State of Colorado, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to effectuate timely service of process; and

4. That JUDGMENT IS ENTERED as follows:

a. On behalf of defendants, Daniel S. Maus, individually and in his official capacity, and Elizabeth B. Strobel, individually and in her official capacity, and against plaintiff, Trenton H. Parker, as to all claims and causes of action asserted herein; provided, that the judgment as to these defendants IS WITH PREJUDICE;
b. On behalf of defendants Bruce T. Barker, Stephanie L. Arries, and John Cooke, and against plaintiff, Trenton H. Parker, as to all claims and causes of action brought against them in their official capacities; provided, that the judgment as to these claims against these defendants IS WITH
PREJUDICE;
c. On behalf of defendants Bruce T. Barker, Stephanie L. Arries, and John Cooke, and against plaintiff, Trenton H. Parker, as to all claims and causes of action brought against them in their individual capacities; provided, that the judgment as to these claims against these defendants IS WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and
d. On behalf of defendant Board of County Commissioners of the County of Weld, State of Colorado, and against plaintiff, Trenton H. Parker, as to all claims and causes of action brought against it; provided, that the judgment as to this defendant IS WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 27th day of September, 2012.

FOR THE COURT:

JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK

By: ____________

Edward P. Butler

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Parker v. Maus

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 27, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01777-REB-CBS (D. Colo. Sep. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Parker v. Maus

Case Details

Full title:TRENTON T. PARKER, Plaintiff, v. DANIEL S. MAUS, in his individual and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Sep 27, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01777-REB-CBS (D. Colo. Sep. 27, 2012)